Skip to Content
Add Network with Us — Join Membership


Thousands Protest in Kolar Over Alleged ₹10 Crore Work-From-Home Fraud Scheme

Investors in Karnataka’s Kolar district have accused a private company of collecting deposits ranging from ₹1 lakh to ₹30 lakh by promising regular income from home-based packing work. Payments allegedly stopped two months ago, prompting large-scale protests and demands for police action.
July 21, 2026 by
Thousands Protest in Kolar Over Alleged ₹10 Crore Work-From-Home Fraud Scheme
Administrator

A suspected work-from-home investment fraud involving more than ₹10 crore has emerged in Karnataka’s Kolar district, where a large number of investors gathered outside the office of a private company demanding the return of their money.

The complainants have accused Sri Kalikadevi Enterprises of attracting people with promises of regular monthly earnings through home-based packing assignments.

According to the investors, the company collected substantial security deposits before providing work involving products such as incense sticks, camphor, paper plates and paper cups.

The allegations remain under examination, and no court has determined that the company or any individual committed fraud.

Company Allegedly Offered Home-Based Packing Work

Complainants stated that Sri Kalikadevi Enterprises began operating approximately one year ago from Palasandra Layout in Kolar.

The company allegedly promoted work-from-home opportunities under which participants were expected to pack products from their homes.

The work reportedly included packing:

  • Incense sticks
  • Camphor
  • Paper plates
  • Paper cups
  • Other household products

Investors claim that the company linked monthly payments to the amount deposited by each participant.

Security Deposits Ranged From ₹1 Lakh to ₹30 Lakh

According to the complainants, individuals were asked to provide security deposits ranging from approximately ₹1 lakh to ₹30 lakh.

The company allegedly promised regular salaries or returns based on the size of the deposit and the packing work assigned.

Many participants reportedly considered the arrangement an employment or small-business opportunity rather than a conventional financial investment.

However, where income is directly linked to the amount deposited instead of genuine work performed, such a model may present significant financial risk.

Initial Payments Allegedly Built Confidence

Investors said that the company made regular payments for several months and, in some cases, for nearly one year.

The continued payments allegedly created confidence among existing participants and encouraged them to recommend the scheme to relatives, friends and other residents.

Complainants claim that the apparent payment history led more people to deposit money with the company.

This pattern is frequently seen in suspected investment frauds, where initial payments are used to build credibility and attract larger amounts.

Operations Expanded Across Kolar District

According to the investors, the company later expanded its presence by opening branches in:

  • Budikote
  • Malur
  • Other areas of Kolar district

The expansion allegedly increased public confidence and gave the appearance of a growing and established business.

Complainants estimate that approximately 2,000 to 3,000 people may have joined the programme.

The total amount deposited is alleged to have exceeded ₹100 million, or ₹10 crore, although authorities are still examining the records to establish the exact figure.

Payments Allegedly Stopped Two Months Ago

Investors claimed that salary and return payments stopped entirely during the previous two months.

When participants approached the company for an explanation, they allegedly did not receive any satisfactory response.

Some complainants further claimed that employees associated with the business could no longer be contacted and that the office appeared largely abandoned.

The sudden stoppage of payments led investors to suspect that their deposits might not be returned.

Investors Gather With Bonds and Documents

On Monday, a large crowd assembled outside the company’s office carrying investment bonds, payment records and supporting documents.

The protesters demanded:

  • Immediate repayment of deposited funds
  • A police investigation into the company’s operations
  • Identification of persons controlling the collected money
  • Freezing of relevant accounts and assets
  • Legal action against anyone found responsible

Several investors stated that they had deposited their life savings after being assured of stable monthly earnings.

Others allegedly borrowed money or raised funds from family members to participate in the scheme.

Victims Report Serious Financial Distress

The protest highlighted the financial impact on families who had relied on the promised income.

Some participants reportedly believed the programme would allow them to earn from home while managing household responsibilities.

Others viewed it as a small-scale business opportunity requiring limited technical skills.

When payments stopped, investors were allegedly left with outstanding loans, lost savings and no functioning source of income.

The extent of the losses will depend on verification of individual investment documents and banking records.

Company Manager Seeks One Week

Amid the protests, a company manager identified as Ramya reportedly approached officials at the offices of the Kolar Superintendent of Police and the Deputy Commissioner.

According to complainants, she requested one week to arrange payment of the outstanding amounts.

She reportedly assured officials that the investors’ money would be repaid.

It remains unclear whether the company has sufficient funds or assets to meet the alleged liabilities.

Authorities are expected to verify any repayment proposal and examine the financial capacity of the business.

Police Examine Financial and Company Records

Authorities are reportedly reviewing:

  • Bank transactions
  • Deposit receipts
  • Investment bonds
  • Company registration records
  • Branch-level documents
  • Payments made to investors
  • Identity of directors and managers
  • Use of the collected funds

Investigators may also examine whether money from new participants was used to make payments to earlier investors.

If such a pattern is established, the scheme may be examined under laws relating to cheating, breach of trust, unauthorised deposit-taking or other financial offences.

No Arrests Officially Confirmed

As of the latest report, no arrests had been officially confirmed in connection with the matter.

The absence of an arrest does not indicate that the allegations have been accepted or rejected.

Police must first examine documentary evidence, identify the persons responsible for controlling the company and determine how the collected money was used.

Any criminal liability will depend on the findings of the investigation and subsequent judicial proceedings.

Local Organisations Demand Strict Action

Representatives of the Karnataka Rakshana Vedike, along with affected investors, have called for a comprehensive investigation.

They have urged authorities to:

  • Trace the allegedly collected funds
  • Protect the interests of investors
  • Identify movable and immovable assets
  • Prevent the disposal of company property
  • Take stringent legal action where evidence supports it

Investor groups have also demanded that authorities establish the total number of affected individuals and the complete financial exposure.

Expert Warns Against Guaranteed Income Schemes

Cybercrime expert and former IPS officer Prof. Triveni Singh warned that fraudsters increasingly use work-from-home opportunities and guaranteed-income offers to attract victims.

He advised the public to independently verify:

  • Company registration
  • Directors and promoters
  • Business premises
  • Financial statements
  • Regulatory permissions
  • Source of promised returns
  • Actual market demand for the products

He also cautioned that offers promising unusually high or guaranteed monthly income should be treated with suspicion.

Employment Offers Should Not Require Large Deposits

Legitimate employment generally does not require workers to deposit several lakhs of rupees before receiving assignments.

Where a company demands a substantial security amount, individuals should ask:

  • Why the deposit is necessary
  • Whether it is refundable
  • Where it will be held
  • Whether it is protected by an escrow mechanism
  • How the promised salary is generated
  • Whether earnings depend on recruitment or investment size

A business model that generates income mainly through deposits from participants may not be sustainable.

How Investors Can Protect Themselves

Before joining a work-from-home or investment programme, individuals should verify the company through official corporate and tax records.

They should also insist on:

  • A written contract
  • Clear refund terms
  • Verified bank accounts
  • Proper invoices and receipts
  • Details of directors and authorised representatives
  • Evidence of genuine product sales
  • Independent legal or financial review

Payments should never be made solely on the basis of verbal assurances, social media promotions or testimonials from earlier participants.

Investigation and Recovery Efforts Continue

The Kolar authorities are continuing to examine the company’s business model, investment records and money trail.

The key questions include whether the company conducted genuine commercial operations, whether funds were diverted and whether the promised payments depended on deposits collected from new participants.

The final determination will depend on the documentary evidence, police investigation and findings of the competent court.

All allegations remain subject to due process and judicial determination.

Shunyatax Global Insight

The alleged Kolar scheme demonstrates how fraudulent investment models can be presented as employment opportunities. When workers are asked to provide substantial deposits and their monthly earnings are linked to the amount invested rather than actual productivity, the arrangement should be treated as a high-risk financial scheme.

Before paying any security deposit, individuals should verify the company’s legal existence, financial capacity, revenue model and refund mechanism. Businesses offering genuine home-based work should maintain transparent contracts, separate customer and worker funds, and avoid making guaranteed-return claims that are unsupported by actual commercial activity.

in News
Share this post
Archive