ED Recovers ₹22,280 Crore from Top Defaulters

In a major disclosure on India’s fight against high-profile financial crime, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman informed Parliament that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has restored or secured ₹22,280 crore in assets linked to some of the country’s most notorious economic offenders — from Vijay Mallya to Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi.

The announcement, made during a discussion on supplementary demands for grants in the Lok Sabha, underscores the government’s effort to recover public money from large frauds that shook India’s banking system and triggered the Fugitive Economic Offenders regime.

ED’s ₹22,280 Crore Recovery Drive: The Big Picture

According to figures shared in the House, the ED’s actions under anti-money laundering and economic offences laws have led to the restoration or attachment of assets worth ₹22,280 crore across a clutch of high-impact cases. The bulk of this recovery is tied to three names that have come to symbolise India’s recent financial scandals: Vijay Mallya, Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi.

The Finance Minister framed the recoveries as part of a broader message that the government is “relentlessly pursuing” wilful defaulters and fraudsters and ensuring that diverted funds are traced, seized and channelled back to banks and genuine investors.

Vijay Mallya: Over ₹14,000 Crore Returned to Public Sector Banks

At the centre of the recovery effort is fugitive businessman Vijay Mallya, once the flamboyant promoter of Kingfisher Airlines. Sitharaman stated that properties worth ₹14,131.6 crore linked to Mallya have been recovered through ED action and restored to public sector banks (PSBs).

This figure significantly exceeds the original adjudicated loan amount, highlighting the extent of asset identification, seizure and realisation carried out over several years. For lenders and regulators, it has become a key case study in how cross-border economic offences can be pursued by combining domestic enforcement powers with international legal cooperation.

Nirav Modi and the PNB Fraud: Over ₹1,000 Crore Recovered

The Finance Minister also highlighted recoveries from the infamous Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud case involving diamond trader Nirav Modi. Properties valued at approximately ₹1,052.58 crore have been restored to a mix of public and private sector banks.

The PNB scam, which surfaced in 2018, sparked a systemic rethink in trade finance processes, prompting tighter controls on instruments such as letters of undertaking and closer scrutiny of cross-border guarantees. The ED’s recovery in this case is being seen as an important signal that complex fraud structures can still be unwound to protect creditors.

Mehul Choksi: Assets Attached, Auction Pipeline Underway

In the case of Mehul Choksi, accused in connected frauds involving jewellery and luxury goods, the ED has attached properties worth around ₹2,565.90 crore. These assets are now in the process of being readied for auction and monetisation, with the eventual goal of returning proceeds to affected banks and investors.

While full realisation is still pending, the scale of the attachment indicates the agency’s focus on tracking layered and offshore assets typically associated with large economic offences.

Beyond Big Names: NSEL, SRS, Rose Valley and Surya Pharma

The ₹22,280-crore figure is not limited to three high-profile fugitives. The minister’s statement also referenced other significant recoveries:

• National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) case: About ₹17.47 crore restored to genuine investors and banks.
• SRS Group: Roughly ₹20.15 crore restored.
• Rose Valley Group: Around ₹19.40 crore restored.
• Surya Pharmaceuticals Ltd: About ₹185.13 crore recovered.

Taken together with the Mallya, Modi and Choksi cases, these recoveries illustrate the ED’s widening footprint across diverse sectors — from aviation and luxury goods to pharmaceuticals and collective investment schemes.

What It Means for Banks, Investors and Policy

For India’s banking system, the recoveries provide partial relief in long-drawn default and fraud episodes where large exposures had already been provisioned as losses. While the amounts recovered may not fully compensate for reputational and opportunity costs, they reduce the eventual hit to bank balance sheets and, by extension, taxpayers.

Policy-wise, the numbers are likely to be cited as evidence in favour of strong enforcement frameworks such as the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act (FEOA). At the same time, civil society and legal experts continue to debate due process safeguards, proportionality of enforcement, and the need to balance deterrence with fair trial standards.

Political and Legal Signals from the Finance Minister’s Statement

Sitharaman’s intervention in the Lok Sabha clearly sought to send two signals: first, that the state is actively pursuing offenders who have left India or attempted to shield assets abroad; and second, that recovered funds are being channelled directly back to banks and victims, not merely parked as attached properties.

For fugitives facing extradition proceedings or parallel litigation overseas, the detailed recovery numbers are also becoming part of the legal narrative — cited in foreign courts as evidence of the scale of enforcement action and potential creditor redress.

Shunyatax Global Editorial Note

At Shunyatax Global, we track the evolving landscape of financial regulation, enforcement and cross-border recovery, connecting complex legal developments with their real-world impact on banks, investors and markets.

For deeper analysis on India’s enforcement architecture, the economics of bad loans, recovery mechanisms and global compliance trends, visit Shunyatax Global Services.

Professionals, compliance teams and policy enthusiasts are encouraged to follow Shunyatax Global, share our coverage across #Finance, #Governance and #Risk domains, and engage with our expert-led insights on the future of economic enforcement.